Liquidity preference theory argues that people prefer to keep assets in a liquid form, such as cash, over less liquid assets like bonds, stocks, or real estate. The upshot is that investors expect a greater premium, all else being equal, for taking on a longer-term loss of liquidity. This inclination is primarily due to the uncertainty of the future. By holding liquid assets, individuals, businesses, and investors can better navigate unforeseen financial and economic changes, especially during crises.
Key Takeaways
- Liquidity preference theory describes the supply and demand for money as measured through liquidity.
- John Maynard Keynes mentioned the concept in his book The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (1936) concerning the connection between interest rates and the supply and demand for money.
- In real-world terms, the more quickly an asset can be converted into currency, the more liquid it becomes.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/liquiditypreference.asp-final-61b55e392c86409fb0b4cf0e2315bd40.jpg "Theory of Liquidity Preference Definition: History, Example, and How It Works (1)")
However, there is a tradeoff between holding cash, which offers liquidity but no returns, versus bonds, which provide interest or returns but are less liquid. The interest rate is, effectively, the reward investors demand to part with liquidity and hold less liquid assets like bonds.
Liquidity preference theory says that interest rates adjust to balance the desire to hold cash against less liquid assets. The more people prefer liquidity, the higher interest rates must rise to make them willing to hold bonds. Thus, the theory views interest rates as a payment for parting with liquidity.
How Does Liquidity Preference Theory Work?
Liquidity preference theory, developed by John Maynard Keynes, aims to explain how interest rates are determined. The key premise is that people naturally prefer holding assets in liquid form—that is, in a manner that it can be quickly converted into cash at little cost. The most liquid asset is money.
Economic conditions like recessions that create uncertainty raise liquidity preference as people wish to remain more liquid. This requires higher interest rates to induce a shift to illiquid assets. The liquidity preference theory thus views interest rates as emerging from people's desire for liquidity versus illiquid, interest-earning assets. The more liquidity is preferred, the higher the rate required to overcome that preference.
According to the theory, interest rates provide an incentive for people to overcome their liquidity preference and hold less liquid assets like bonds. Bonds provide interest income but are less liquid than cash since they cannot be immediately converted to money. Thus, the more illiquid a bond, the more incentive people will need in terms of its interest rate.
For this reason, the theory holds that interest rates are determined by the supply and demand for money, which depends in part on this preference. When liquidity preference is high, people want to hold more cash, decreasing the money supply and reducing bond prices. To match this preference, interest rates have to rise as an incentive for giving up this liquidity. Conversely, a lower liquidity preference means people are willing to hold more bonds, increasing the money supply and lowering interest rates.
Three Motives of Liquidity Preference
Keynes argued that the desire for liquidity springs from three motives: the transactions, precautionary, and speculative motives.
- Transactions motive: the need to hold cash for day-to-day transactions like buying goods and services. This demand for liquidity is fairly predictable and correlates with the income and expenses of individuals and firms: the demand for liquidity increases with income. The transaction motive is fundamental and exists regardless of the level of interest rates, emphasizing the essential role of money as a medium of exchange in daily economic activities.
- Precautionary motive: the urge to hold onto cash as a buffer against unexpected expenses or emergencies. Individuals might hold onto money or easily accessible funds to cover unexpected medical costs, car repairs, or other financial demands. Similarly, businesses may maintain a liquidity cushion to weather unexpected operational or market challenges. The precautionary motive underlines how money is a store of value that provides a sense of security in the face of uncertainty.
- Speculative motive: holding onto cash to take advantage of future investment opportunities not yet available. The speculative motive tends to be more pronounced among investors and financial institutions, and its intensity can vary with the expectations regarding the future trajectory of interest rates, economic growth, and market conditions. When the nominal interest rate is low, people hold onto money, even if it provides no interest income. But this changes as the interest rate ticks upward.
Who Was John Maynard Keynes?
John Maynard Keynes was an influential 20th-century British economist. His groundbreaking work, “The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money” (1936), challenged conventional economic wisdom and laid the foundation for modern macroeconomic theory.
His economic theories, collectively termed Keynesian economics, fundamentally changed how governments and financial institutions perceive and respond to economic crises and helped shape postwar economic thinking. He championed the idea that government intervention is crucial to stabilizing economies during financial downturns. Though challenged often by neoclassical economists, monetarist theorists, and others over the years, his work became the cornerstone of modern macroeconomic theory, with liquidity preference theory being one of his notable contributions.
Liquidity Preference and the Yield Curve
Liquidity preference theory has important implications for the shape and movement of the yield curve. The yield curve plots interest rates across different maturities for bonds of the same credit quality.
Normally, the yield curve slopes upward, meaning long-term interest rates are higher than short-term rates.Imagine a line graph where the vertical axis is for interest rates and the horizontal axis extends out time for the duration of investments. The yield curve indicates what interest rates you can earn for different lengths of time. Under normal circ*mstances, the graph slopes upward, meaning you'll see higher interest rates as you invest your money for longer periods. This upward slope reveals that people expect higher returns for locking away their money in long-term investments like bonds.
This fits with what liquidity preference theory would suggest: individuals prefer liquidity, all else being equal, leading them to favor short-term securities over long-term ones. Short-term securities provide more liquidity since they mature faster, enabling reinvestment or cashing out sooner. This higher demand for short-term bonds leads to lower short-term interest rates (as bond prices are bid higher, their interest rates decline). However, to entice investors toward long-term securities, these bonds must offer higher interest rates to compensate for the decrease in liquidity. This dynamic naturally steepens the yield curve.
Changes in liquidity preference can also shift the position and shape of the yield curve. If liquidity preferences rise due to uncertainty or a recession, the demand for short-term bonds will increase as investors flock to quality, liquid assets. This raises short-term rates relative to long-term rates, flattening or inverting the yield curve. If liquidity preferences decline during economic stability, the yield curve steepens as investors become more willing to invest in higher-yielding long-term bonds.
A steeper yield curve implies a higher liquidity premium, as investors demand more for holding long-term bonds. Conversely, a flatter or inverted yield curve could indicate lower liquidity premiums or other market dynamics at play.
Liquidity Preference Theory and Investing
Liquidity preference theory provides a useful framework for investors to consider when making asset allocation and risk-management decisions. Investors can apply their understanding of liquidity preference to choose assets and strategies that align with their liquidity needs and risk tolerance.
During periods of high liquidity preference, such as recessions, investors may increase allocations to safe and liquid assets like cash and short-term government bonds. Holding highly liquid assets provides protection and the flexibility to shift into other investments when the market changes. When that occurs, you may take on more risk and illiquidity through investments like stocks, real estate, or high-yield bonds.
The theory also highlights the value of laddering strategies (planning investments to provide a steady cash flow) to balance liquidity. Bond ladders with staggered maturities can provide stable cash inflows to cover liquidity needs. Cash reserve buffers also help manage liquidity risk. Investors should hold higher cash reserves when liquidity preferences rise to avoid being forced to sell illiquid assets at unfavorable prices.
Overall, liquidity preference theory does not give you an ideal set of assets to buy but provides a framework for adapting to economic conditions and your liquidity needs. Investors can apply the theory to build portfolios resilient across the liquidity preference cycle, combining liquid low-risk assets with higher-return illiquid assets in appropriate proportions.
Criticisms of Liquidity Preference Theory
While influential, liquidity preference theory has been critiqued by some economists. One common objection is that many complex factors, not just liquidity preference, determine interest rates. The approach is also said to simplify changes in interest rates to just the demand and supply of money. However, factors like inflation, default risk, credit risk, and the range of investment opportunities, among others, also do so.
The theory has also been criticized as too passive: it sees interest rates adapting to changing liquidity preferences rather than vice versa. But monetary policy can actively affect interest rates, affecting investment and consumption behavior beyond just passively responding to liquidity demand.
Further, the empirical evidence for the impact of liquidity preference on interest rates is mixed. Some economists argue other factors like inflation expectations play a bigger role in shaping rate changes. Measuring liquidity preference quantitatively is also difficult. Moreover, the theory may not work well in today's globalized economy. Capital mobility allows liquidity to flow internationally to where rates are highest. So, national interest rates would reflect global liquidity preferences, not just domestic factors.
How Does Liquidity Preference Theory Help Understand Financial Crises?
Liquidity preference theory can shed light on liquidity dynamics and its effect on financial stability. During financial crises, the heightened preference for liquidity can exacerbate market conditions. For instance, a sudden rush for liquidity can lead to fire sales of assets, plummeting asset prices, and a tightening of financial conditions. By understanding the principles of liquidity preference, policymakers, and financial institutions can better anticipate and mitigate the adverse effects of financial crises and devise strategies to enhance financial stability.
Do Other Economic Theories Build on or Challenge Liquidity Preference Theory?
Yes, several contemporary economic theories challenge or build upon liquidity preferences. For instance, rational expectations and market efficiency theories often posit that markets adjust quickly to new information, which might undercut the speculative motive for liquidity preference. In addition, developing new financial instruments and technologies that enhance liquidity and manage liquidity risk can also lead to rethinking liquidity preference. However, modern monetary theory and post-Keynesian economics build upon or extend Keynesian ideas, including liquidity preference theory, to explain modern economic phenomena.
How Does Fiscal Policy Influence Liquidity Preferences?
Fiscal policy uses government spending and tax policies to influenceeconomic conditions. Expansionary fiscal policy, which increases government spending or cuts taxes, can lower liquidity preference by stimulating economic growth and confidence, leading to lower interest rates. Contractionary fiscal policies often raise liquidity preference because of heightened uncertainty, putting upward pressure on rates.
The Bottom Line
Liquidity preference theory attempts to explain the relationship between liquidity, interest rates, and economic stability, highlighting how individual and institutional behaviors around liquidity occur within financial markets. Originating in the work of Keynes, liquidity preference theory continues to serve as a pivotal lens through which to consider monetary economics phenomena. For investors, a grasp of liquidity preference is productive in making better asset allocation and risk-management decisions. At the same time, for policymakers, it sheds light on how monetary policies might sway interest rates and market stability.
